User talk:Zzzzz

User talk:Zzzzz/Archive1 - 5 march 2006 User talk:Zzzzz/Archive2 - 3 april 2006 User talk:Zzzzz/Archive3 - 9 may 2006 User talk:Zzzzz/Archive4 - 18 may 2006 User talk:Zzzzz/Archive5 - 13 jul 2006 User talk:Zzzzz/Archive6 - 21 jan 2007

NOTICE: Messages placed on this page are deleted at my discretion.

Hong Long action cinema spoken version

Hi - I've noticed you made a request for a spoken version of this article, and I'd be happy to make one once I know the correct pronunciations of a few words - I've made a list here on the talk page. Hope you can help. Cheers, Panser Born (talk) 12:43, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You may want to look again. Not even close to 3RR. Purgatory Fubar ^Converse or Snafu 15:16, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

BBC

It seems that you have reverted the BBC disambiguation page to a version from a while back (I haven't worked out which one) without explanation as to why or mention of the edit being a revert in the edit summary. This has resulted in the deletion of entries added since then and edits made to bring the page into compliance with MoS:DP.

I would be grateful if you can give your reasoning for the edit (e.g.: deleted entries were non-notable or not called BBC or you objected to re-org).

Thanks, Joe Llywelyn Griffith Blakesley _talk _contrib 17:22, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Abraham Abulafia

Hello,

I would like to know, please, why did you add Abraham Abulafia to Category:Fictional computers. Thanks. A.R. (talk) 13:58, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Halloween II

There are two "Halloween II"s. Technically both should be disambiguated, because you cannot show that the 1981 film is going to be the most commonly sought out version of the name - especially not right now while the movie is causing must chatter about Zombie's changes. If you think a disambiguation page is necessary...cool. But, there are two identical films with this title, and both have their own level of popularity. The fact that one has been around longer does not necessarily dictate that it is the one people will be looking for primarily. Just looking at the states, people have gone to the 1981 page 203 times this month. On the other side, the 2009 film has had 5904 hits this month, and we haven't even finished June. The more news about this film comes out, the move traffic it gets. We need to wait to see which is going to be the primary topic (which we won't be able to effectively do until well after the film is released). BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:08, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I've at least temporarily solved the problem but turning Halloween II into a disamguation page for the two films. BIGNOLE (Contact me) 13:12, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hong Kong action cinema

Hi Zzzzz! It's my sad duty to note that I've nominated the article you've worked on for Hong Kong action cinema for Feartured Article removal. If you have comments regarding the review, discuss it on the review page. Cheers! Andrzejbanas (talk) 02:53, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Ganerer/List of computer pranks

User:Ganerer/List of computer pranks, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Ganerer/List of computer pranks and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Ganerer/List of computer pranks during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Illuminati cardgame cover small.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Illuminati cardgame cover small.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Illum GA-1975.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Illum GA-1975.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Illum L-1975.jpeg)

Thanks for uploading File:Illum L-1975.jpeg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:09, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tenebrae FAR

I have nominated Tenebrae (film) for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 02:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kyle Bradford for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kyle Bradford is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kyle Bradford until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mz7 (talk) 18:33, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Illum EitP-1975.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Illum EitP-1975.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Zzzzz. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Zzzzz. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]